BENCHMARKING IN THE MIGRANT BUSINESS




Recently, Gerard Collomb, the French Interior minister stated that migrants were “benchmarking” European countries to assess which one offered the best social advantages.  He was probably focusing on economic migrants rather than political or war asylum seekers.  It is actually opportune that migrants do benchmarking since they have to recoup their journey investment! Obviously, the minister’s comments made many people on the left of the political spectrum wince; however, his observation only reflects the reality of the situation.  He was repeating what many migration experts had said all along.

Economic migrants, particularly Sub-Saharan Africans spend large amount of money to be able to land on the European shore to seek asylum.  Most of them have travelled on borrowed money.  The media wrongly focuses on the people-trafficking phase in the failed state Libya.  However, the fees paid to the smugglers are only the tip of the iceberg! This racket is still a fraction of the total travel budget of the migrants.  Every step of the Sahara crossing has its price tag.  Migration to Europe, although hazardous, is a well-oiled business and a time-honored tradition in many countries.  In specific regions, migration is encouraged and financed by the community, and the successful migrants are expected to pay back their sponsors to sustain their local rent-based economy.  


In 2002 in Libya, I met three migrants on their journey to France.  Muammar Gaddafi had just half-opened his country to foreigners[1] and tourists.  Our organized tour had no contact with local people. People were wary and kept their distance.  We were accompanied by two tour guides, one professional and an extra provided by the police department, supposedly to keep us safe! The migrants came from Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger and were working undocumented in our hotel in the remote city of Sebha in the Fezzan desert (780 kms south of Tripoli).  We had to outwit our “guardian angel” to chat with these young men.  They all spoke good French and were happy to share their experiences with us.

The Malian, let’s call him Mamoudou[2], came from the Kayes region which has sent hundreds of thousands of migrants to France, Mali’s former colonial power.  The Malian diaspora is prominent and the number of Malians living in France is estimated at more than 120,000.  Mamoudou was the more experienced of the three and had a failed attempt under his belt.  He had managed to reach the port of Sirte, paid a smuggler (no money back!) but was caught by Gaddafi’s police and turned back.  He had spent the $ 4000 loan from the village’s elders.  Mamoudou was very proud of his knowledge of French and led us to believe that there was some selection process: the elders are not betting their money on the wrong horse!  He was now working to make money for his next attempt.  He claimed to need $2000 for the boat trip to Italy. 

After crossing the Sahara, the other two fellows were stranded penniless in Sebha and had to make money to continue your journey.  When in Tripoli, every morning we noticed Sub-Saharan African men waiting at street corners to compete for casual labor.  There were so many of them that our guide felt compelled to tell us that they were “boat people” who had to make money for the “passeurs”, the French word for smugglers.

The three men had contacts in France and felt confident that their respective diaspora would provide assistance.  Entering France illegally did not seem to bother them, neither did it occur to them that they might not be welcome by the French authorities.  France granted independence to its African colonies at the beginning of the 1960s, but for many of their citizens, France increasingly looks like an insurance against hardship.  

I obviously don’t know Mamoudou’s whereabout.  Hopefully, this determined fellow reached Paris’s banlieue where his relatives lived.   Has he managed to get asylum? Is he a legal or illegal resident? He is probably in France making do with little money and remitting the major part of his income to the Kayes to repay the journey loan.  Many migrants live in de facto community ghettoes where they have little social mobility options.  The burden of the compulsory remittance keeps them in poverty; it is a modern version of debt bondage.  Undocumented migrants can’t find work and fall victims of the servitude of the black economy.  It is nearly impossible for European countries to expel failed asylum-seekers, as the countries of origin of these predominantly economic migrants refuse to take them back.  It is a shortsighted view because in some countries migration is equivalent to brain drain, as the most determined and ambitious leave.

The sight of thousands of undocumented migrants aimlessly loitering the streets of European cities have bolstered populist parties and destabilized mainstream ones.  In a period of budget cuts, people increasingly regard migrants as a social and financial burden to society.  Illegal migration is a deeply emotional issue and it has become the main concern of European citizens.  The rejection of uncontrolled immigration and the restoration of borders are mainstream opinions in many European countries.  The apparent loss of control has fueled frustration and vexation.  Islamic terrorism has further increased exasperation.  Those who say otherwise are in denial.  The pro-immigration (on humanitarian ground) left is totally irresponsible, if not hypocritical.  Along with the unions, it pretends to welcome migrants, but by refusing to liberalize the labor market and loosen social benefits, low skill migrants are unable to find jobs. 


Seven years after the revolution which toppled and killed Gaddafi (2011), the chaos continues in Libya.  The current migration crisis which may rupture the European Union results in part from the lawlessness in Libya.  This anarchy has encouraged migration and boosted human trafficking.  In 2018, competition among passeurs has deflated the price but increased the risks.  Mamoudou would have paid less than $ 1000 for a slot on an inflatable dinghy, but at a risk of never reaching France.  The current situation is a loss-loss.  The African countries are drained of their most entrepreneurial citizens and the European countries cannot or are unwilling to put to good work these plucky foreigners.





[1] The Libyan oil industry allowed foreigners, who lived in gated communities, close to the sites.
[2] A very common name in Sub-Sahara Africa.  The undocumented Mali-born migrant “Spiderman” who scaled a building to rescue a toddler dangling from a balcony railing was named Mamoudou Gassama.  He was also from the Kayes region.

Comments

  1. First comment from a French friend: "ça y est je l'ai lu. trés intéressant car basé sur du vécu et bien documenté. Effectivement ce n'est ni plus ni moins ce que raconte le journaliste du Figaro dans son interview."
    The Mali migration network I referred to it well known. Other countries are emulating it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry Beatrice, but ....

    A refugee is fleeing for his life, he has lost his home.

    The Syrian and Iraqui refugees arrive in a safe refugee tent camp in adjoining countries.

    Once they leave there to go to Europe with many other nationalities they become economic migrants. Merkel said "we will take anyone" and opened the doors.

    She is now suffering from this as is Southern Europe.

    The EU press has stopped saying refugees and now says migrants, but too late

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this, but looking at the two graphs, I wonder if all the Europe-bond refugees or migrants (as I call them) have lost their house! I stick to my experience: when in Libya, I talked to real people and their migration networks are a fact. I do agree that worsening economics and social crisis and a demography out of control are limiting people's economic options. But what about trying to sold their problems themselves like they did in S. Africa and Zimbabwe, instead of taking a risking boat trip to Europe?

      Delete
  3. Another very interesting blog Beatrice. Unfortunately today’s “migrants” don’t wish to assimilate into the countries culture but to change that countries culture to theirs - not a good outcome on the horizon😟

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another comment: "I suspect we might not agree on some of the things you mention, except to say that if the ‘brain drain’ continues from the countries you reference, long term that will be a major problem for those countries. If there ceases to be a part of the population that might possibly help to overcome the current dilemma [be it economic or political], the future of those countries will not be bright, and it will simply be perpetuated.

    Obviously there is no easy answer to any of this, but to saddle the populations of Europe with these migrants is also not fair [they have their own problems], and if the result of recent elections is any guide, the push-back will continue. I am also surprised by the way the media, police, and politicians, treat the people of [eg] Germany, France, Italy, etc. like fools, by trying to ignore the rape/assault of females. But it is also happening in Oz, and Sudanese gangs in Melbourne have been running wild [break-ins, car-jackings, bashings], displaying contempt for the people who welcomed them here. The push-back will happen here as well."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Comments are pouring in, another one: " B, a bit of courage, you hint that the Libya chaos has emboldened "passeurs", what about do good NGOs? I think rescue ships are acting at "pull factor" or even colluding with these profit-driven smugglers. Read somewhere that even Frontex claims that NGOs ships were encouraging the smugglers' more risky tactics."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I read about this, but a 2017 report claims that it is not the case. More people are looking for jobs and taking risks. Anyway, this subject was not my purpose.

      Delete
  6. From another friend: "I agree--the whole thing has turned into a racket. As you rightly point out, it's not good for the countries being left either.
    We need a better process to distinguish economic migrants from people whose lives are genuinely in danger." LC.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Another comment. " It seems to me that mpprh got mistaken, the EU media still refers to Syrians and Iraqi as refugees. The sticking point is that refugees or migrants take decades to integrate and become economically productive. It costs a lot of money to train them and patience is in short supply." M.F.P.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another comment from a friend.: "Of course there is a big difference between reporting and offering your opinion. The Cartesian way is first to neutrally expose the case, then discuss its pros and cons and then come to a balanced conclusion. You made the first step but left out the next ones. Of course, the last steps are the most difficult ones.
    You already know tangentially my opinion about the second step:
    Europe and America are guilty of having treated Africa, and also a sizable chunk of Asia, as a territory to be exploited to the maximum for their greedy benefit instead of leaving them alone and let them develop their own culture and values. In any case, it would have been much better to have sent teachers rather than adventurers.
    Well, the pros I can think of are that the riches extracted by Europe from the colonized countries contributed to Europe’s Golden Age. Of course, another is that interracial mixing is always beneficial, both from the point of view of physical strength and beauty as well as from culture.
    Conclusion: Let the migrants’ fusion with Europeans continue, distribute them equally within all European countries relating it with their GDP and integrate them socially. A good example is the French football team at the World Cup, full of very good black players !! "L.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am glad to post another comment from a friend. Here it is:
    "I tried to do a reply to your friend ‘L’ [?], however, it did not post. Basically I was reminding him/her that if all the ‘very good black players’ played for their ‘home’ team, then that country’s self-esteem would be enhanced [particularly if they won], which would flow through to the economy, and maybe keep them at home instead of trying to board a boat to Europe. Additionally, the reference to Western countries doing nasty things to African countries may have been true many years ago, but these days it is China that is doing those countries no favours at all. And even world courts are unable to stop their annexation or island building. Just a thought."P.B.


    ReplyDelete
  10. Received from another reader: " Hi B., just reading about last night EU meeting on migrants. Interestingly, the heads of state have coined a new word: " irregular migrants" for economic migrants!. You must admit that NGOs ships are acting a pull factor, they are surrogate for the people smugglers. They went too far. Good, now two of their ships are out of action. "

    ReplyDelete
  11. Received a witty comment: "Anti-migrant paranoia? If the boats were full of Australians, it will be a non-issue!!!" M.H.

    ReplyDelete
  12. A comment from a former colleague: "Hi, I really enjoyed reading your sensible blog. True, African migrants are increasingly unwelcome in Europe (their different skin color, religion, culture and seen as social system free-loaders).
    One should also blame liberal economists who "sold" immigration as a panacea: i.e. to pay the pensions of an aging population and keep the factory humming. Sadly, it has not worked this way, and people feel short-changed." M.L.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Another comment: "The currently European paranoia about Muslim and black migrants is due to being forced to reap now their criminal colonization of Africa, abandoning it when they couldn’t control it any longer. Then, criminal dictatorships took over.
    What about the huge migration of Venezuelans to their neighboring countries ? Their reason is similar: they are leaving massively their own country because their criminal government has rendered their life unlivable. "XXX

    ReplyDelete
  14. Comment in French from N.M. "Oui, j'avais lu ton blog sur les migrants . Je l'ai trouvé très très intéressant ( tu sais de quoi tu parles , au moins , pas comme certains journalistes )
    Je viens de le relire et tous les commentaires depuis .
    Juste une petite anecdote :
    un Malien était venu il y a une dizaine d'années chez moi pour une réparation domestique ; il travaillait pour une entreprise.
    Il m'avait raconté qu'il avait marché avec sa mère du Mali à la côte lybienne .
    Il parlait un français remarquable
    , il venait d'acheter son 2ème appartement sur plans à Montrouge et il continuait à envoyer de l'argent au pays ; j'étais admirative !
    On dit qu'il y a plus de Maliens à Montreuil qu'à Bamako .
    J'arrête là.".


    ReplyDelete
  15. From me: Read in the NYT today about migrants from Central American paying smugglers to get over the US border: "I just need to get out of here at all cost".
    Paste this link into your browser:
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/30/world/smuggling-illegal-immigration-costs.html?emc=edit_th_180701&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=343604680701

    ReplyDelete
  16. Friends and I had a voluminous email exchange. Following Angela's new migration decisions (to save her coalition), I am summing up our discussions' conclusions:
    1)The African migrants are seen as social benefits free-loaders and not people who are escaping to save their life.
    2) In France, undocumented migrants get free medicals on priority basis (not to spread diseases!). French people have to wait their turn, and they feel shortchanged!
    3) Migrants are looking to fill jobs which don't exist.
    4) The NYT article on Salvadorian migrants crossing the Texas border points to a need for regulated immigration. We think people are fed up by the uncontrolled and criminal/trafficking aspects of the migration. Individual migrants may be welcome but the flow is not.
    We concluded that people don't want to close their borders but they want a better control to let in those who, a) really need help it, and b) can benefit the economy. The Canadian immigration model.

    ReplyDelete
  17. From a UN colleague: "everyone knows that the large majority are young migrants in search of a better life in Europe but would badly be needed to develop their home countries . (I remember two young colleagues from UNDP who had family in France and Canada. One day they went on leave and never came back. ) I wonder whether there could not be a role for the UN, for example UNDP and ILO? Could they not create more incentives to keep them in their home countries? By assisting governments in job creation policies? Decent jobs for qualified people, not just work that barely assures subsistence?
    The NYT article about the Salvadorian migrant is fascinating. Migrants and refugees have always existed, and it seems to me that Facebook and Whatsapp and similar things have contributed to the increasing number of migrants by facilitating the organization if such travel.".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Calvisson Service Economy

Happy As A Senior Citizen In Rio de Janeiro

PANEM E CIRCENSES